Firstly apologies avid readers for the prolonged absence. (avid? readers?) I know your skipper promised to up the output on the Black Pig Blog but the usual obstructions once more prevented a regular stream of garbage – work, work, fishing, work – and of course the fact I simply won’t let anyone else in the office loose on this little corner of the Handy Shipping Guide site (no, I’ll die before I let you have the codes Renfield).
. . . So to business, as we trawl from the blossoming dawn into the wee small hours putting the news content of the site together every day we wade through mountains of unprintable dross, discarding reams of it like the multi layered packaging on a Fabergé egg sent by a bondage obsessed e Bay vendor.
I can handle having to redact all the self promoting guff that inevitably accompanies the vast majority of press releases sent by overeager copywriters.
I accept the fact that many ‘newsworthy’ items are actually dull as ditchwater announcements with faster acting anaesthetic effects than draught Ketamine.
All this is worth it to extract items which we feel may be of use or interest to somebody somewhere.
What I find unacceptable are pronouncements from the meddling idiots who, having run out of worthwhile ways to make a living, spend their time promoting madcap schemes which, if suggested by an illiterate hermit with megalomaniac tendencies would be immediately discarded by their proposer as simply a waste of money, being too stupid even for his self obsessed, deranged mind.
Today the electronic trawl which is the editor’s e mail turned up just such a proposal which we have seen Oh, so many times before. An American university research fellow, no doubt occupying a lofty intellectual perch, is investigating ‘the benefits of distance-based fees for the trucking industry’. Lets break it down then, yet another academic believes (and I quote) ‘funding the transportation system with a fuel tax is no longer sustainable’.
Why’s that then? Presumably this theoretical genius knows the money has to come from somewhere to support transport infrastructure, in fact that is his very point. The man in question, a Mr Ferrol Robinson from something called the Humphrey School of Public Affairs
(he’s done well since the milk marketing board adverts) states,
“We have known for years that heavy trucks do cause more damage. A lot of cars cause less damage, but they still put the mileage on the roads. So we need them to pay a fair amount for their use.”
We have news for you Ferrol old boy, those trucks supply everything you wear, everything you eat and drink and the tools you use to write this junk.
Yes, they have a devastating impact on the road surfaces which is why there are such a plethora of ways used to collect the readies to pay for it spread throughout the countries of the world. So the fact that a big rig swallows diesel at the rate of 6 or 7 miles per gallon means you have the perfect instrument to control your revenue stream and balance your infrastructure costs considering you, Mr Ferrol Robinson, can transport your fuel efficient backside around presumably in your Toyota Prius hybrid at an alarmingly low cost.
But no; Mr R would like to study the possibilities to charge mileage for every vehicle on the road and blend it into a clever formula to ensure everyone pays their fair whack. OK lets see how we approach this, obviously we can’t trust anyone to fess up to their true mileage, nor is it beyond them to fiddle odometer readings to avoid taxes.
Simple then, we use modern technology like vehicle recognition systems and Robinson quotes the German system of Autobahn tolling as a good example of how to work things out to his satisfaction. Which is a bit like saying because you can control the environment in a fish tank you can apply the same principals to ocean management.
I wonder if research fellows like Mr R actually have a concept of how the real world works.
Rather than looking to implement what will prove another expensive layer of bureaucracy and maintenance with the introduction of number plate readers, Bluetooth recognition systems etc. we in Europe can solve Ferrol’s problem in one simple sentence.
Charge US consumers a realistic sum for their fuel supplies.
In January 2011, motor gasoline taxes averaged 48.1cents and diesel fuel taxes averaged 53.1cents a gallon which accounted for 14% of the price of gasoline and 15% of the price of diesel (in some states tax reached a stellar 70 cents per gallon by the latest figures I could find)). The taxed rate in the UK for all road fuels on excise duty alone hovers around the equivalent of $3.60 per US gallon plus a further 20% VAT on both duty and fuel sale price (which includes of course the cost to the garage). Hence we have (according to your Captain’s dodgy maths) a retail pump price on diesel fuel of around $4.00 per US gallon whilst the equivalent figure in the UK , without the VAT equals $7.20 (according to AA figures today). So that’s $8.65 to anyone who can’t claim the tax back from the state.
So here’s the rub as old Bill would have put it.
Every politician in America is terrified of the effect a sensible tax rate on fuel would have. California claims to be the greenest thing since the Jolly Green Giant fell into a tub of luminous algae
- but even they can only charge around a 10 cent surcharge for a gallon of juice. A 10 cent surcharge on every gallon sold in the US would, according to market analysts estimates, raise an extra $20 BILLION in revenue. Now friend Robbo says it will take $1.3 to $2.5 trillion to get US infrastructure back on track. That equates to a tax increase of between $5.20 and $10.00 a gallon, obviously unacceptable to all. That would mean however raising the sum total required in a single year. Spread that over a decade and you’re talking 52 cents to $1.00 a gallon and Hey Presto!
The big problem is of course that fitting the whole of the States with technological junk and employing armies of public servants to administrate yet another tax provides jobs, which to a politician is like truffles to a pig. So be ready friend this insanity might actually happen to our cousins across the pond, despite the fact the theory has been tested to destruction by many other developed governments.
So, to paraphrase Art and Paul here’s to you Mr Robinson, kick the idea into touch.
Or keep churning out your spurious opinions on how to ensure every road is nice and flat for your car and those nasty big rigs pay the bill.
Remember though as you tuck into your cornflakes, that sticker price is going up, the consumer always picks up the tab, only I suspect it’s going to rise a lot more if we drive down your road than if you screw your courage to the sticking place (sorry again Bill) and pay a sensible price for your road fuel – it’ll still be cheaper than here in Blighty.
Perhaps though the Captain is being a little hasty, there may actually be a whiff of conspiracy hereabout.
If we all switch to electric and efficient hydrogen or even hybrid vehicles within the next ten years (and the US citizens are liable to if the Yanks stick the price of juice up to a sensible level) then there really will be nothing in the kitty to fund Ferrol's asphalt infrastructure.
So if you really want to pay full whack for your roads friends, swallow the bitter pill and raise the taxes now - some hopes.
Or act like men (Ferrol and the US politico's), don't feed us the 'trucks must pay their way' line, just confess that you're hoping to create jobs for the boys and their corporations, raise higher revenues and make a few quid for yourselves.




